• Users Online: 264
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2006  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 185-189

Comparative evaluation of accuracy of six different implant impression techniques: An in vitro study


Department of Prosthodntics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Chennai, India

Correspondence Address:
Sanjna Nayar
Department of Prosthodontics, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College, Allapakkam Main Road, Chennai
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.30693

Rights and Permissions

AIM: To identify the most accurate impression technique and the ideal impression material to transfer the intra-oral position of implant fixtures to the working cast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: About 30 impressions of the reference model were made using polyvinyl siloxane (Group I) and polyether (Group II) with 15 impressions each. Each group was subdivided into three subgroups based on the trays used; stock metal tray, closed custom tray, and open-window custom tray. Specific dimensions of the resultant casts were measured using coordinated measuring microscope. Mean actual cast error and subgroup's actual cast error was calculated and statistically analyzed using ANOVA. RESULTS: The subgroup's mean actual cast error observed in Group I - A, B, and C was 0.02825 0.0091, 0.01679 0.0055, and 0.08442 0.01516 mm, respectively. The subgroup's mean actual cast error observed in Group II - A, B, and C was 0.03035 0.0164, 0.01924 0.0051, and 0.0212 0.010 mm, respectively. There was no statistical significance between the observed differences. CONCLUSIONS: All the techniques studied showed some distortion and the difference had no statistical significance. The selection of impression technique and impression material can be based on clinical situation and according to the clinician's preference.


[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed5573    
    Printed63    
    Emailed3    
    PDF Downloaded678    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal