| ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2021 | Volume
: 21
| Issue : 3 | Page : 276-280 |
|
|
Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between titanium-ceramic and cobalt-chromium-ceramic: An in vitro study
Kamal Ramjee Vaska1, Chandrasekhar Nakka2, K Mahendranath Reddy3, Siddesh Kumar Chintalapudi4
1 Prosthodontist, FMS Dental Hospitals, Hyderabad, India
2 Dr. Sekhar's Dental Care and Implant Centre, Hyderabad, India
3 Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Sai College of Dental Surgery, Hyderabad, India
4 Department of Prosthodontics, Sree Sai Dental College and Research Institute, Srikakulam, Telangana, India
Correspondence Address:
Kamal Ramjee Vaska
F-46, F Block, Maduranagar, Hyderabad - 500 038, Telangana
India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_81_21
|
|
|
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength between ceramic layered over titanium and ceramic layered over cobalt-chromium alloy, which are used in the fabrication of screw-retained implant prosthesis.
Settings and Design: In-vitro – Comparative study.
Materials and Method: A total of 40 samples (20 samples of Titanium in Group 1 and 20 samples of Cobalt-Chromium in Group 2) were fabricated. For all the samples bonding agent was applied on to the sand blasted surface and firing was done at a temperature of 980° C. A layer of opaque was applied using a brush and placed back in the furnace at a temperature of 910° C. Then ceramic was layered on to the surface with putty index as guide and firing was done in the ceramic furnace up to a temperature of 880° C followed by glazing. Shear bond strength was measured using a Universal Testing Machine.
Statistical Analyses Used: One sample t-test and paired sample t-test.
Results: Descriptive statistics were done to calculate mean differences between groups and samples. The mean bond strength of titanium- ceramic samples was more than those of cobalt-chromium-ceramic samples. Inferential statistics used in the study were one sample t-test for intra-group comparison and paired sample t-test for inter group comparison which showed no statistically significant difference between the two metal types (P value = 0.163).
Conclusion: The shear bond strength of ceramic veneered over titanium meets the ISO requirements of minimum shear bond strength between metal-ceramic systems and has achieved the clinically acceptable values. The use of titanium super structure over titanium implants reduces the adverse effects and avoids undesirable effects.
|
|
|
|
| [FULL TEXT] [PDF]* |
|
 |
|
