The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2016  |  Volume : 16  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 182--186

Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study


Srinidhi Bhat1, Ramesh Chowdhary2, Sudhindra Mahoorkar1 
1 Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India
2 Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Ramesh Chowdhary
Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Golden Plaza Complex, Court Road, Gulbarga - 585 102, Karnataka
India

Statement of Problem: Over 30% of the world population suffers from edentulism. Implant supported overdenture have been a relatively successful treatment option for edentulism and have shown to slowed the rate of residual resorption and maintain the vertical height of the residual. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to measure patient masticatary efficiency and satisfaction with the mandibular one-, two-, and three-implant-retained overdenture therapy when compared with conventional denture in a the same patients. Materials and Methods: Ten complete edentulous patients, who were wearing conventional complete dentures, were involved in this study. Three single piece endosseous implant of 3.0 mm in diameter and 13 mm in length were surgically placed in the mandible in the region of B, C, and D. Mandibular denture was connected for single, two, and three implant supported overdenture periodically and checked for masticatory efficiency using a bite gauge and patient satisfaction using a questionnaire. Results: Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Four groups of bite forces when compared to each other. Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing significance. Signed rank test showed no significance (0.268) when Group 2 was compared with Group 3. When Group 3 was compared with Group 4, and Group 1 compared with Group 4, rank test showed significant values. Four groups were compared with each other for patient satisfaction, Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing no significance. Conclusions: A single midline implant supported overdenture can be considered as a suitable and cost-effective treatment option over conventional denture. The study concludes that masticatory efficiency of this single midline implant supported overdenture is better than the conventional complete denture.


How to cite this article:
Bhat S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study.J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:182-186


How to cite this URL:
Bhat S, Chowdhary R, Mahoorkar S. Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc [serial online] 2016 [cited 2022 Jun 26 ];16:182-186
Available from: https://www.j-ips.org/article.asp?issn=0972-4052;year=2016;volume=16;issue=2;spage=182;epage=186;aulast=Bhat;type=0